Tablet as a training material: Contribution of content diversity to education rate
Abstract
Aim: The study’s overarching objective was to investigate how people use tablet computers.
Method: As part of the screening model used in this study, interviews with professionals in the field were conducted. Twenty students will be randomly selected from the study group’s visual roster.
Findings: In this study, we found that as technology has advanced, the demand for tablet computers has also grown. These gadgets have a variety of uses, including education, business, and leisure. They worked very well as training materials when used on computers. More and more often, people’s preferences are influenced by factors such as when and where they received their education. Communicating with the user in multiple ways (visually, aurally, and physically), these gadgets make it possible for students to learn in a way that best suits them, wherever they may be, at whatever time of day. Tablets, equipped with purpose-built educational software, can be used in the same environment as traditional classroom instruction, allowing for more focused learning.
Implications/Novel Contribution: The findings can be used to promote a greater understanding of the potential of education in the classroom. Students should use the findings to deepen their expertise in computer-based networking and problem-solving.
References
Aldhafeeri, F. M., & Alajmi, M. R. (2017). Towards excelled mobile learning implementation in Kuwait university: Aspects and obstacles of use and non-use. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 264-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.3
Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17-45.
Baras, T. (1985). Application of distance education principles to literature teaching (Unpublished mater’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Chadyiwa, M., & Mgutshini, T. (2015). Using mobile handheld devices as tools of learning and teaching for student EHPS: A blessing or a curse? International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 85-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.20003
Farooq, U., Schafer, W., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). M-education: Bridging the gap of mobile and desktop computing. In International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Virginia, VA.
Hashim, H., Salam, S., & Mahfuzah Mohamad, S. N. (2017). Investigating learning styles for adaptive massaive open online cource (mooc) learning. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 282-292. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.4
Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). Ipad in education: A case study of ipad adoption and use in a primary school. In 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hawaii, HI.
Kongmanus, K. (2015). Development of project-based learning model to enhance educational media business ability for undergraduate students in educational technology and communications program. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 287-296. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.5.5
Mockus, L., Dawson, H., Edel-Malizia, S., Shaffer, D., An, J., & Swaggerty, A. (2011). The impact of mobile access on motivation: Distance education student perceptions. World Campus Learning Design, 4(5), 1-34.
Newhouse, C. P., Williams, P. J., & Pearson, J. (2006). Supporting mobile education for pre-service teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 34-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1288
Perkmen, S., & Öztürk, A. (2009). Multimedia and visual design. Istanbul, Turkey: Profil Publishing.
Quinn, C. N. (2011). Designing mlearning: Tapping into the mobile revolution for organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L.-M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008
Roebuck, K. (2012). Tablet computer: High-impact emerging technology what you need to know: Definitions, adoptions, impact, benefits, maturity, vendors. New Jersy, NJ: Emereo Pty. Ltd.
Sadik, F. (2016). Investigating primary school teachersâA ̆ Z views about their classroom management behavior. ́ Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 76-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.2.2
Supratman, L. P. (2015). A case study of classroom seating arrangement to promote studentsâA ̆ Z communication ́and interactivity in telkom university. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(3), 130-133. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.20005-3
Tarmuchi, R. N., Mohamed, H., & Ismail, A. S. (2015). Asynchronous learning tools use in graduate study: A preliminary survey. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(1), 13-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.20003
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 45-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346
Ward, N. D., Finley, R. J., Keil, R. G., & Clay, T. G. (2013). Benefits and limitations of ipads in the high school science classroom and a trophic cascade lesson plan. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 378-384.
Yalin, H. I. (2012). Education technologies and developing materials. Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Istanbul.
Yordanova, K. (2007). Mobile learning and integration of advanced technologies in education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, Rousse, Bulgaria.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
