Institutional arbitration versus ad hoc arbitration: Chinese and Iranian perspectives
Abstract
Aim: There are merits and drawbacks to both institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitration. In contrast to institutional arbitration, which occurs within the framework of an arbitral organisation, ad hoc arbitration, which is not administered by any institution, requires the parties to make their own arrangements for selecting the arbitrators and designating applicable laws and rules of procedure. The point of this piece is to contrast the effectiveness of these forms of arbitration under two distinct legal regimes.
Method: This research will utilise a doctrinal review and a comparative test to examine the two legal systems.
Findings: Institutional arbitration has not been formally introduced into Iran’s legal system, and ad hoc arbitral awards are not recognised in China. It is recommended in this paper that Iran adopt institutional arbitration because of its many benefits and that China recognises ad hoc arbitration to honour the autonomy of the parties involved.
Implications/Novel Contribution: The research fills a gap in the existing literature by providing an in-depth analysis of the legal systems in both countries. In both countries, credit is given differently.
References
Ambikai, & Ishan, Z. (2016). Comparative analysis of law on tort of deviant behaviors in Malaysia and India. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 243-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.4.5
As, Y., & Purba, C. S. (2017). The urgency of pontianak local public policy in emboding legal protection against teacher. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(6), 241-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.3.20001-6
Boniface, A. E. (2016). Animals: âAŸobjectsâ ˘ A˘ Z or â ´ AŸsentient beingsâ ˘ A˘ Z? A comparative perspective of the ´ South African law. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 143-155. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.3.3
Edna, S., & John, W. (2012). Benefits of arbitration for commercial disputes. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2ETT7fW (accessed on 14 June, 2016)
Gharavi, H. G. (1999). The 1997 Iranian international commercial arbitration law: The uncitral model law à l’Iranienne. Arbitration International, 15(1), 85-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.1.85
International Arbitration Law Firm. (2017). Arbitration in Iran. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2GHR3di (accessed on 14 June, 2018)
Lawyer, L. A. (2017). The changing character of democracy in the pre and post colonial Cameroon: An old practice, a new word. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 43-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0106
Merrills, J. G. (2017). International dispute settlement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Mohebbi, M. (1996). The role of attorneys in encouraging to conciliation and arbitrationâA˘Z, Iranian bar ´ association quarterly. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2s20Bpu (accessed on 13 July, 2017)
Moses, M. L. (2017). The principles and practice of international commercial arbitration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rovine, A. W. (2010). Cost concerns in the drafting of arbitral awardsâA˘Tan issue of ethics. In Rovine, A (Ed.,), ˇ Contemporary issues in international arbitration and mediation: The fordham papers. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
Shah, N., & Gandhi, N. (2011). Arbitration: One size does not fit all: Necessity of developing institutional arbitration in developing countries. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 6(7), 232.
Sriboonyaponrat, P. (2016). The implementation process of the public policy to promote and develop the quality of life of the disabled in Thailand. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(6), 198-202. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.2.20001-6
Tao, J. (2008). Arbitration law and practice in China. New York, NY: Kluwer law international.
Tao, J. (2011). Salient issues in arbitration in China. American University International Law Review, 27, 807.
Yilmaz, D. V. (2017). International student recruitment in policy and practice: A research from Turkey. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 01-08. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0101
Zhang, T. (2013). Enforceability of ad hoc arbitration agreements in China: China’s incomplete ad hoc arbitration system. Cornell International Law Journal, 46, 361.
Zhongcai, F. (1995). Arbitration law promulgated by the standing comm. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2CBWgza (accessed on 14 July, 2018)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
