An efficiency analysis of the Malaysian economic sectors: Policy or institution implications

  • ERIC BALAN
  • MOHAMMAD SAEED
Keywords: Economic policy, Economic sectors, Sector employment, Economic efficiency, Data envelopment Analysis, Sector efficiency

Abstract

Aim: The study analyzed the economic efficacy of different industries that produce a country’s GDP. These industries were also studied because of their significant economic impact on the country.
Methodology: The research utilized Data Envelopment Analysis to compare and contrast two strategies for gauging the efficacy of administrative and planning processes: the CCR and the BCC. The analysis revealed problems and implications for policy and institutions in the Malaysian economy.
Findings: The analysis conclusively established this when it revealed the sectors were providing insufficient outputs to the national economy. These industries are crucial to the country’s output. Still, they are also affected by external factors such as those occurring in the rest of the world, and the current development crisis in Malaysia has only worsened matters. The focus then shifts to economic policies and institutions’ ability to withstand outside interferences.
Implications/Novel Contribution: The study’s rejection of the null hypothesis raised questions about the sectors’ respective allocations of resources. Allocations had remained flat over the 20 years from 2000-2019, resulting in inefficiencies in policy implementation and the inability of institutions to fulfill their intended function. Research in Development Economics and Economic Policy.

References

Aktan, C. (1989). Supply-side economics and supply-side fiscal policy. IIBF Dergisi, 1(2), 190-206.

Ali, H., Er, A., Ahmad, A., Lyndon, N., & Ahmad, S. (2013). An analysis of the impact of foreign investment on regional disparities: A case of Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(14), 7-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n14p7

Balan, E. (2020). Sector strengthening: A data envelopment analysis study of the China-Central Asia economic partnership. California, CA: Sage Publications.

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In, handbook on data envelopment analysis. Boston, MA: Springer.

Cunningham, S. (2011). Understanding market failures in an economic development context. Mesopartner Monograph, 4, 11-20.

Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250.

Hussin, F. (2013). The contribution of economic sectors to economic growth: The cases of Malaysia and China. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(2), 36-48.

Ireland, P. N. (1994). Supply-side economics and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(3), 559-571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(94)90043-4

Ismail, R., & Yuliyusman, F. (2014). Foreign labour on Malaysian growth. Journal of Economic Integration, 657-675.

Kenessey, Z. (1987). The primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary sectors of the economy. Review of Income and Wealth, 33(4), 359-385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1987.tb00680.x

Kilic, O., Ceyhan, V., & Alkan, I. (2009). Determinants of economic efficiency: A case study of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) farms in Samsun Province, Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 37(3), 263-270.

Kumar, S., & Gulati, R. (2008). An examination of technical, pure technical, and scale efficiencies in Indian public sector banks using data envelopment analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 33-69.

Kumar, V. C. (2012). An introduction to data enveloment analysis. In V. C. Kumar, Data envelopment analysis and its applications to management. Boston, MA: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Minford, L., & Meenagh, D. (2020). Supply-side policy and economic growth: A case study of the UK. Open Economies Review, 31(1), 159-193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-019-09536-8

Mukherjee, S. (2018). Does the clark-fisher hypothesis hold for the Indian economy? International Journal of Business Quantitative Economics and Applied Management Research, 5(8), 38-49.

Najib, I. Z. M., Nordin, R. M., Ahnuar, E. M., & Sukor, K. M. (2019). Malaysian as the component of labour force for construction industry in Malaysia. In MATEC Web of Conferences, New York, NY.

Ruttan, V. W. (1965). Growth stage theories and agricultural development policy. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(4), 17-32.

Santhirasekaram, S., & Amirthalingam, K. (2010). Direct and indirect effects of conflicts, violence and war on economic growth in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from https:/bit.ly/2W8b3Om

Schafran, A., McDonald, C., Lopez Morales, E., Akyelken, N., & Acuto, M. (2018). Replacing the services sector and three-sector theory: Urbanization and control as economic sectors. Regional Studies, 52(12), 1708-1719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1464136

Todorova, T. P., et al. (2019). Government budget balance and economic growth. Economy & Business Journal, 13(1), 114-127.

Vassiliev, A., Luzzi, G. F., Flückiger, Y., & Ramirez, J. V. (2006). Unemployment and employment offices efficiency: What can be done? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40(3), 169-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2004.10.007

Yocarini, R. S. (2003). The shift to services: A review of the literature. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp964.pdf
Published
2021-03-15
Section
Articles