Implementation of limited liability principles and doctrine of piercing the corporate veil in management of local liability companies

  • ABDUL HALIM BARKATULLAH
Keywords: BUMD, Company, Liability

Abstract

Aim: This research aims to analyze how limited liability in the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine is used by BUMD administration in the form of Local Liability Companies.
Methodology: The normative law method was employed in this study; this is the process of looking for the rule of law, legal principles, or legal doctrines to provide a solution to a legal problem, followed by an analysis of that problem using inductive reasoning.
Findings: Due to these studies’ findings, a company is considered a separate entity from its founders, members, or investors when recognized as a legal entity under the law. Important to the company’s legitimacy is the idea of the Perseroan (company) as a separate legal entity whose assets are kept separate from those of its shareholders and for whom there is limited personal liability. Second, the current regulations on UUPT also apply to the administration of BUMDs structured as Local Liability Companies.
Novelty/Implications: As a result of the limited liability of shareholders, this doctrine safeguards the interests of vulnerable outsiders.

References

Ambikai., and Ishan, Z. 2016. “Comparative Analysis of Law on Tort of Deviant Behaviors in Malaysia and India.” Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences 2(4): 243-249.

Chidir, A. 1987. Legal Entity. Bandung, Indonesia: Alumni.

Endang, K., and Risal. 2017. “The Effect of Investment Decision Financing Decision Dividend Payment Policy and Company Size.” Journal of Administrative and Business Studies 3(2): 105-113.

Hamilton, R. W. 1996. The Law of Corporation. Saint Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

Harahap, M. Y. S. H. 2011. Company Law Limited. Jakarta, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika.

Hartono, S. R. 1985. “Forms of Co-operation In A Commerce World.” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Law-University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Kesowo, B. 1995. “ Some Principles In The Limited Liability Company Law.” Newsletter Magazine, Retrieved March 24, 2015 (http://p3i.or.id/).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. “Behind the Corporate Veil âA ̧S Using Corporate ̆Entities for Illicit Purposes.” OECD Publication, Retrieved February 11, 2015 (http://goo.gl/rAo3wK).

Peter, M. M. 2005. Legal Research. Jakarta, Indonesia: Prenada Media.

Pramono, N. 2006. “State Property Separated By Law 19 of 2003 on SOEs,” in Problems About Business Law, edited by S. R. Hartono. Sinar Grafika, Yogyakarta: Indonesia.

Prasetya, R. 1996. The Company’s Independent Position. Bandung, Indonesia: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Purwosutjipto, H. M. N. 1978. Understanding the Principal of Indonesian Trade Law. Jakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit Djambatan.

Satrio, J. 1999. Personal Law Part I Persoon Natural. Bandung, Indonesia: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Vandekerckhove. K. 2007. Piercing the Corporate Veil. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Yoo, J., Lee, M. K., and Lee, W. S. 2016. “Asymmetrical Corporate Responses to Economic Information: Applying the Firm Size Effect.” Journal of Administrative and Business Studies 2(1): 29-34.

Zimmer, D. 2005. “Legal Personality”, in 400 Years of Company Law, edited by E. G. Jager. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Legal Publisher.
Published
2017-12-26
Section
Articles